As the JBL offseason is upon us, it's the time, as always, to discuss potential rule changes or tweaks to the JBL scoring system or whatever else may come up.
You may not know this but the JBL does have a Rules Committee made up of 7 JBL owners. Idaho, Arctic, Chilliwack, Seoul, Brussels, Bangkok and Golden.
The WhatsApp Rules Committee chat room has been frenetic over the last couple of days with loads of discussion (mostly on one topic) but a few ideas and comments have been raised that I thought I should summarize and BRIEFLY comment on here.
#1 - The JBL should have a Rules Committee and a place to discuss potential changes before moving anything to the larger group of 15 owners. We have a WhatsApp chat now. We have a Commitee. We're good.
#2 - Any rule changes or proposals in the Chat Group needs to be seconded before it could be discussed or voted on by the JBL membership. This is pretty straight forward. No issues here either.
#3 - If a rule is brought up and voted on for 3 years in a row and rejected - the proposal needs to have a 10 year window before it can be voted on again. And you can't vote on the same thing within a year. This really hasn't been an issue. But we can write it down. Sure, Benny has brought up the injured guys on draft night being protected but we don't need to make a mountain out of a mole hill in my opinion. Moving on.
I think we already do the above 3 items and they can just be absorbed into the JBL constitution. I hate doing votes on things that are common sense.
#4 - Once a year, the JBL Commissioner, me, has the power to make, alter, change, scrap a rule. Not for me. Not interested. Moving on.
#5 - Shorten the JBL fantasy season. Whether it's 70 games, 75 games or ending one week earlier (this year would have been 24 weeks instead of 25 weeks). This year, because of how close the standings were the last week was a big deal. Golden went from 2nd to 4th; Brussels 3rd to 5th; Bangkok 5th to 3rd; Wack from 4th to 2nd; and Arctic from 15th to 14th. Most years, it doesn't mean a damn thing. The frustration stems from everyone sitting out the last few games of the season. Personally, doesn't really bother me but I can appreciate others frustrations. For me, I've always saved FA dollars for the last few weeks to sign the Kris Dunn's or Skylar Mayes or Trendon Watford's. Further, if you know you're not protecting a player (ie. Nurkic or whoever) - drop them and sign a FA. But sure, this one might have traction for a vote.
There was another suggestion about a trophy or something for whoever is leading the JBL after 65 games before the "silly season" starts. My first thought was wouldn't this just be another award for French? This suggestion, for me, was more of a side bet than something that needs to be put into the JBL constitution.
Then we get into some actual discussions around potential changes to the JBL scoring system.
As we all know, Points are weighted 20%, Rebounds are 15% and the other 5 categories (FG%, 3PT%, steals, blocks, ATO) are 13%. Yes, it adds up to 100%.
I think the first place we need to start though is do we need to consider a category or weighting change to adapt to a changing NBA?
If the answer to that poll is yes - then we dive deeper into possible changes.
If the vote is NO - everything I've written from here on is irrelevant.
A. Early discussions have members of the Rules Committee liking the idea of changing Rebounds from 15% to 13% (same as all the other categories) and adding that 2% to Points (bumping it up from 20% to 22%). This takes some value away from the big men and adds more to scoring.
B. Another suggestion was changing 3PT% to 3PM. There are literally hundreds of points to support either side. It's really a personal preference on this one. I think the biggest argument to move to 3PM is that it evens out the value of the little guys compared to the big guys in the JBL. Big guys don't shoot 3's and are of no help in a 3PM category.
So a couple comments:
1. Moving to 3PM (a counting stat) means that injuries and 'resting' now affects another JBL category. Can't move up in this category if your player is resting and not making 3's.
2. If the JBL is trying to mirror the NBA's move to the 'little guy' it might be good to look at the most successful NBA teams right now. What if NBA teams were ranked based on JBL categories? Who would win? The math has been done. The highest correlation was 3PT% followed by FG%. The lowest correlation was steals and blocks. Top 5 NBA teams by JBL categories -- Memphis, Boston, Denver, Atlanta, Golden State. Bottom 5 NBA teams using JBL weightings - Detroit, Miami, Houston, San Antonio, Portland.
The best NBA teams shoot the 3 really well...not just a lot.
I'm moving on from this one as it's not about trying to change anyone's mind about whether 3PT% or 3PM is the better category to use. Or which is more reflective of today's NBA. Or what other fantasy leagues use. I'm not bothered either way.
For me, it's simple - do JBL owners want to switch from 3PT% to 3PM? Yes or No.
That's it. That's what it comes down to. The 15 JBL owners. What do WE want to use.
Moving on....
Another suggestion floated was moving from ATO to just assists. Again, moving to a counting category means your guys need to be healthy and playing to accumulate points.
Sure Trae Young averaged over 10 assists a game (741 assists) but he also turned the ball over 300 times. Those turnovers should be factored in. ATO allows that. It does make guys like Al Horford and Tyus Jones more valuable because of their outstanding ATO. So be it. I'm OK with that.
Again, if we're trying to mimic the NBA then I'm sure most NBA coaches hate turnovers and try to avoid them at all costs. So we should continue to factor them in. I am fine with ATO as it is. But hey, maybe there is appetite for just Assists? I haven't heard that.
Another comment came up that I am a supporter of Free Throw percentage. I can't recall stating that. Maybe I did at some point. The JBL used FT% for one season. I remember we all hated it. I do not support bringing it back.
Another comment about setting our JBL lineups WEEKLY or DAILY. This was voted on prior to last year's JBL season. The vote was 11-3 in favour of keeping it WEEKLY.
And I will comment again, the only CBS options are Daily or Weekly. It's not like we can do it a couple times a week.
Obviously Daily moves would allow better roster management for those in-week injuries and end of season 'resting' nights.
That said, this requires more time from each JBL owner to stay on top of things and ensure they make the switch each and every day (if they wanted). There are countless times where owners haven't even updated their lineup to start the week.
I think moving to Daily only gives the JBL diehards even more of an advantage because they are going to be actively updating their rosters to maximize games played each week.
One JBL team played 927 man games this year and at the bottom of that list a team played 848 man games. 79 games difference. That's like given your opponents a 2 week head start before your team starts gathering any stats.
I don't know if there is any new appetite to vote on this again.
I'll end with a more structured proposal for everyone to think on. But it starts with this statement and ultimate JBL poll.
1. Do JBL owners want to make any changes to our categories or weightings?
If the answer to that is YES - then here's an idea.
For next season 2023/24
Change rebounds from 15% to 13% and add that extra 2% over to Points (bumps them up from 20% to 22%)
For 2024/25 season
Bump Points from 22% to 28% and all other 6 categories move from 13% to 12%.
This puts more focus on scoring and gives JBL teams another year to think about keepers and how they will build out their teams for the future weightings.
Or you just do the first part - move rebounds down from 15% to 13% and carry the hell on as is.
The other item that might have interest to move to a vote is switching from 3PT% to 3PM.
I'm not sure of anything else yet that has been 'seconded' to move to a vote.
That's all for now....